(By
Jules Goslinga) In this blog post I would like to write about some of the
sporadic thoughts I have had about our trip since we’ve returned. So, we’ve
been back in the Netherlands for nearly a week now, and as with returning from
any journey, it is easy to slide back into the usual patterns. I’m back in the
environment I’m used to, with the people I’m used to, doing the things I’m used
to doing. I realize that I have a somewhat less observing attitude compared to
last week, paying less attention to signs of peace and conflict that were so
prominent in Kosovo. This appears to be because of several reasons. First, here
in the Netherlands, peacekeeping is not a daily matter for many people, let
alone peace-building. Thus, lessons that apply in Kosovo concerning peace and
conflict are triggered less frequently. However, in addition to this, our time
in Kosovo was largely spent in a learning atmosphere, whereas the context in
the Netherlands may not always be as academic and hence allowing for contemplation
of our peace. Lastly, the past couple of
days have been filled with an overload of parties, birthdays, housewarmings,
dinners, boat tours and, not unimportantly, Dormfest. The time I’ve had to
critically look at our country from a peacekeeping perspective is rather
limited.
Nevertheless,
I hope that by acknowledging this tendency to slide back into my normal
(thinking) patterns, I can also remind myself to become more conscious of the
lessons learnt in Kosovo in my daily life. By repeatedly giving recognition to
the different ways that the journey has made an impact on me, I hope make these
impacts last. Perhaps most importantly is a change in my perspective. I believe
that the most inspiring courses at AUC have made an addition to the things I
become aware of when I am not actively engaging in the subject matter of that
respective course. In other words, I notice more or different things and am
able to understand and explain them, when, say, I’m walking through the street.
What
also caught my attention upon returning was the apparent ease with which we as
students were able to explore the various UN branches, NGOs, educational
institutions, etc. On the pretext of understanding Kosovo’s circumstances and by
taking an appropriate observing stance to the many debates, it is possible to
come to learn about both sides to the conflict. We have experienced a hint of
suspicion when talking to the Serbian population in Kosovo after having
mentioned that we resided in Pristina and mainly talked to Albanian people.
Nevertheless, most difficulties were resolved when it became clear that we did
not want to choose a side in the debate, we simply wanted to understand the
debate itself. Perhaps, some of the people even feel some responsibility
towards students in order to avoid the atrocities that occurred during the war
from happening again. In any case, I felt very welcomed by the people we met during
our appointments and those we met more spontaneously. Interestingly, there have
also been times where it seemed that some people, coming from rather unilateral
environments, were more willing to discuss certain topics which were not up for
debate within their own circles.
In
conclusion, as the very loose structure of this blog entry (or complete lack
thereof) may suggest, I believe that in the coming weeks randomly reemerging
memories will trigger me to think about what the course has thought me about
Kosovo, but also about the Netherlands, and ultimately, myself. I suppose it will take some time to let all the experience settle.
No comments:
Post a Comment